Gamified Reading Strategies and Learners’ Motivation: A Basis for Developing an Instructional Guide for Elementary Teachers in Zone 1, Zambales, Philippines

Authors

  • Neil E. Espiritu Taposo Elementary School, Division of Zambales, Philippines
  • Leila L. Ravana President Ramon Magsaysay State University image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/assrj.01.02.13

Keywords:

Gamification, instructional practices, literacy engagement, learners’ motivation

Abstract

This study explored the use of gamified reading strategies and their effects on learners’ motivation, grounded in the ARCS motivational framework, thus addressing gaps in defining how teacher characteristics and instructional practices impact literacy engagement relevant to elementary education. More precisely, the study evaluated the level of gamified strategy implementation, gauged reading motivation among learners, identified significant differences in demographic and occupational variables, and measured the relationship between instructional implementation and learner motivation. Results showed that the majority of teachers were female, middle-aged, master's degree holders with approximately ten years of teaching experience and moderate exposure to gamification training while predominantly using points and rewards systems. Gamified strategies were used in feedback and reflection, collaboration and competition, challenges and missions, and progress tracking consistently throughout teachers. Performance data indicated that learners were much more motivated to read; particularly, the relevance, satisfaction, attention, and confidence dimensions of the ARCS model proved that this contextualized and interactive environment was effective in engagement with reading. The results of statistical analyses showed significant differences in both teachers’ implementation practices and learners’ motivational levels over almost all examined demographic and professional variables, while a strong positive correlation was found between the implementations of gamified strategies and learner motivation to learn, highlighting the pedagogical value of using gamification in literacy development. Results emphasize the need for continued professional development and effective instructional design in gamified literacy instruction. The study suggests that structured integrated gamification contributes to reading motivation and has the potential for educational practices aligned with learner-centered instruction. I recommend that schools strengthen teacher-training programs, encourage creative and innovative ways of reading pedagogy, and also institutionalize gamified instructional frameworks. Future research may consider other factors and the long-term effects of gamification on literacy performance in various learning environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, N. L., Ismail, S., & Nasir, M. K. M. (2021). Teachers’ professional commit-ment and the influence of postgraduate qualifications on career advancement. In-ternational Journal of Evaluation and Re-search in Education, 10(3), 990–998.

Anggrainy, L., et al. (2024). Gamification in education: Enhancing learner engage-ment and motivation. Journal of Educa-tional Technology Research, 12(1), 45–60.

Bernardo, A. B. I. (2019). Education and learn-ing in the Philippines: Trends and issues. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 52(2), 123–145.

Burić, I., & Kim, L. E. (2021). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and class-room management: The role of teaching experience. Teaching and Teacher Edu-cation, 98, 103248.

Caballes, D. G., Villanueva, J. A., & Peñaflorida, A. H. (2021). Teachers’ readiness and atti-tudes toward gamification in basic educa-tion. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(8), 123–139.

Collie, R. J. (2021). COVID-19 and teachers’ somatic burden, stress, and emotional exhaustion: Examining the role of princi-pal leadership and workplace buoyancy. AERA Open, 7, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420986187

Dayagbil, F. T., Palompon, D. R., Garcia, L. L., & Olvido, M. M. J. (2021). Teaching and learning continuity amid and beyond the pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 6, 678692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.678692

Department of Education. (2023). National reading program report. DepEd Philip-pines.

Ganal, N. N., & Guiab, M. R. (2020). Problems and difficulties encountered by teachers in the implementation of the K to 12 cur-riculum. International Journal of Innova-tion, Creativity and Change, 13(2), 806–824.

Kim, L. E., & Asbury, K. (2020). Like a rug had been pulled from under you: The impact of COVID-19 on teachers in England dur-ing the first six weeks of the UK lock-down. British Journal of Educational Psy-chology, 90(4), 1062–1083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12381

Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A re-view of gamification research. Interna-tional Journal of Information Manage-ment, 45, 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013

Koivisto, J., Malik, A., & Hamari, J. (2019). Gamification and behavior change: A lit-erature review. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on Sys-tem Sciences, 2917–2926.

Labrador, M. L., & De Chavez, C. J. (2021). Gen-der composition and professional dy-namics in basic education institutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(3), 512–526.

Lapada, A. A., Miguel, F. F., Robledo, D. A. R., & Alam, Z. F. (2020). Teachers’

Nguyen, H. T., & Tran, T. T. (2022). Male teachers in primary education: Profes-sional identity and retention challenges. International Journal of Educational De-velopment, 89, 102548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4585376

Rahman, N. A., & Hamzah, M. I. (2020). Gen-dered task allocation and professional culture in public elementary schools. Journal of Education and Work, 33(7–8), 567–580.

Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mayr, S., & Mandl, H. (2019). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of spe-cific game design elements on psycholog-ical need satisfaction. Computers in Hu-man Behavior, 69, 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033

Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamifica-tion of learning: A meta-analysis. Educa-tional Psychology Review, 32, 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w

Tan, R. C., & Tuliao, A. P. (2023). Feminization of teaching and gender role expectations in primary education. Educational Re-search for Policy and Practice, 22(1), 85–102.

Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J., & Turci, L. (2019). Beyond cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child Devel-opment Perspectives, 13(2), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12322

Yuan, L. (2023). Instrument validation and reliability testing in educational research. Educational Measurement Journal, 18(1), 25–40.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29

How to Cite

Espiritu, N. E., & Ravana, L. L. (2026). Gamified Reading Strategies and Learners’ Motivation: A Basis for Developing an Instructional Guide for Elementary Teachers in Zone 1, Zambales, Philippines. Advanced Social Science in Research Journal, 1(2), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.11594/assrj.01.02.13

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.