Project B.O.O.S.T.E.R.S. (Brochures Offered Offline to Students by Teachers to Enhance Research Skills): An Evaluation

Authors

  • Arnel S. Miraflor President Ramon Magsaysay State University, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/assrj.01.03.01

Keywords:

Asynchronous micro-learning, Computer-generated brochures, Academic performance, Research skills

Abstract

Senior high school academic workloads and cognitive demands increase, making passive traditional lectures ineffective for reducing student anxiety or building complicated research skills. Targeted, offline asynchronous educational methods are needed. The study evaluated how computer-generated brochure technology affects academic performance and whether Project BOOSTERS and typical self-learning modules varied significantly between pre- and post-test outcomes. A descriptive-experimental design randomly and equally assigned Grade Twelve pupils to the brochure intervention or modular lecture control track. Because of violated normality assumptions, identical pre- and post-tests were given across two weeks and analysed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test. Although both groups improved, Project BOOSTERS had considerably higher post-test means and learning gains, rejecting the null hypothesis. Passive standard lecture sends facts, but it has a lower instructional efficiency than tailored offline brochures, which optimize cognitive gains and independent research methodology mastery. Active learning models should integrate interactive micro-learning modules and well-designed, offline asynchronous materials to reduce conceptual anxiety, subject-specific stress, and develop strong student research skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alvis, M. L., Morris, C. E., Garrard, T. L., Hughes, A. G., Hunt, L., Koester, M. M., & Tinius, R. A. (n.d.). Educational Brochures Influence Beliefs and Knowledge Regarding Exer-cise during Pregnancy: A Pilot Study. 15.

Buchanan, T., Sainter, P., & Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computer in Higher Education, 25(1), 1-11.

Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9.

Earley, M. A. (2018). A synthesis of the litera-ture on research methods education. In-ternational Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(3), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1337586

Fishstrom, S., Wang, H.-H., Bhat, B. H., Daniel, J., Dille, J., Capin, P., & Vaughn, S. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effects of academic interventions on academic achievement and academic anxiety outcomes in ele-mentary school children. Journal of School Psychology, 92, 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.03.011

García-Vandewalle, J. M., García-Carmona, M., Trujillo-Torres, J. M., & Moya-Fernández, P. J. (2022). Analysis of the digital compe-tence of higher education students and its relationship with active interventions. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6813–6833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10903-8

Ghavifekr, S. & Rosdy, W.A.W. (2015). Teach-ing and learning with technology: Effec-tiveness of ICT integration in schools. In-ternational Journal of Research in Educa-tion and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175-191.

Healy, M., & Jenkins, A. (2023). Integrating re-search and inquiry into undergraduate curricula: An institutional intervention framework. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(2), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2043241

Kara, S. (2025). The effect of differentiated instruction on the academic achievement and opinions of 3rd-grade students in sci-ence education: A mixed-methods study. MDPI Education Sciences, 13(10), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101012

Kaware, S. S., & Sain, S. K. (2015). ICT Applica-tion in Education: An Overview. Interna-tional Journal of Multidisciplinary Ap-proach & Studies, 2(1), 25-32.

Mahinay, H. (2023). Modular learning modali-ty of Department of Education: Learners' early assessment of its implementation. Philippine E-Journals, 1(1), 1–15.

Mery, Y., Blakiston, R., & Power, M. (2021). Evaluation of an online, interactive re-search literacy intervention for under-graduate students. The Journal of Aca-demic Librarianship, 47(2), Article 102311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102311

Schindler, Laura A., et.al. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engage-ment: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, volume 14, Article number: 25

Westera, W. (2015). Reframing the role of ed-ucational media technologies. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(2), 19-32.

Wolters, K. (2025). Academic skills training interventions for adolescents in second-ary education: A systematic review. Psy-chology in the Schools / Taylor & Francis, 62(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2025.2548763

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Arnel S. Miraflor. (2026). Project B.O.O.S.T.E.R.S. (Brochures Offered Offline to Students by Teachers to Enhance Research Skills): An Evaluation. Advanced Social Science in Research Journal, 1(3), 495 – 499. https://doi.org/10.11594/assrj.01.03.01

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.