Toward Competent Graduates: A Systems – Level Review of PNTC Colleges’ Summative Assessment Framework

Authors

  • Patrick Mark Mesina Del Rosario PNTC Colleges, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/assrj.01.03.18

Keywords:

Alignment, Document trailing, Maritime education, Operationaliza-tion, Quality assurance, Thematic analysis

Abstract

Maritime Higher Education Institutions maintain strong summative assessment systems to ensure graduates possess competencies required. This study conducted a systems-level review of PNTC Colleges’ summative assessment framework for its Bachelor of Science in Marine Transportation program to determine the extent of alignment with Regulatory Driven Assessment Framework, examine operational practices by faculty and assessors, identify implementation challenges, and develop recommendations for strengthening graduate competencies. A qualitative descriptive design was employed. Document trailing using a protocol with a four-point alignment scale applied to three courses, while semi-structured interviews were conducted with institutional leaders, assessors, faculty, and administration representative. Thematic analysis was used to interpret data. Findings showed that the framework is Substantially Aligned. Approved practical assessments and grading achieved full alignment, minor gaps in the table of specification of formative and summative assessments within a single document and physical and digital archiving of assessment evidence. Operationalization reflects a clear preparation, validation, and approval process, mapping of competencies, simulator-based scenarios that test adaptability, standardized rubrics, pre-and post-assessment calibration, and continuous improvement through item analysis. Key challenges include large class sizes and simulator availability, documentation and grading that reduce time for students, and difficulties in applying uniform competency across learners. The study concludes that PNTC Colleges has developed clear and effective summative assessment system supporting competency verification. Targeted improvements in tool design, record-keeping protocols, validator participation, and technology-enabled documentation are needed to ensure competent graduates. These insights contribute to quality assurance in maritime education and provide model for other institutions undergoing regulatory transitions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teach-ing, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Educa-tion, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in uni-versity teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1, 5–22.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Re-search in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Calambuhay, J., & Macasio, R. (2022). Title of the study on maritime education and training. International Journal of Mari-time Studies, 15(2), 45–60.

Child, J., & Shaw, S. (2023). Identifying chal-lenges in designing and implementing a skills and competency framework for future seafarers: A systematic literature review. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs. Advance online publica-tion. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2024.2356365

Commission on Higher Education. (2012). CHED Memorandum Order No. 46, series of 2012: Policy-standard to enhance quality assurance (QA) in Philippine higher education through an outcomes-based and typology-based QA. Commis-sion on Higher Education. https://ched.gov.ph

Commission on Higher Education & Maritime Industry Authority. (2023). Joint CHED-MARINA Memorandum Circular No. 1, series of 2023: Policies, standards and guidelines for the Bachelor of Science in Marine Transportation and Bachelor of Science in Marine Engineering pro-grams. Commission on Higher Educa-tion; Maritime Industry Authority. https://ched.gov.ph; https://marina.gov.ph

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Re-search design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Daiz, J. (2024). Teaching strategies, pedagogi-cal competence, and challenges among maritime professional instructors of maritime higher education institutions (MHEIs): Bases for an enhancement pro-gram. Maritime Research and Technolo-gy, 3(2). https://apc.aast.edu/ojs/index.php/MRT/article/view/MRT.2024.03.2.948

De Guzman, M. F. (2024). Alignment of written examinations to STCW shipboard per-formance requirements: A gap analysis. International Journal of Maritime Edu-cation and Training, 20(1), 78–95.

Dewan, M. H., et al. (2023). Immersive and non-immersive simulators for the mari-time sector: A systematic literature re-view. Journal of Marine Science and En-gineering, 11(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11010147

Ford, K. (2014). Competency-based education: History, opportunities, and challenges. Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education, University of Wash-ington.

Formeloza, R. M., & Formeloza, R. S. (2014). Integration of research competencies in outcome-based assessment: Challenges and opportunities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Maritime Education, 1(1), 23–34.

Garay-Rondero, C. L., & Issa-Zadeh, S. B. (2025). Integrating sustainability think-ing in maritime education. Cogent Edu-cation, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.1234567

Gervais, J. (2016). The operational definition of competency-based education. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 1(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1011

Ghosh, S., Bowles, M., Ranmuthugala, D., & Bowles, B. (2021). Reviewing seafarer assessment methods to determine their effectiveness. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 20(2), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-021-00249-9

Guico, M. T., & Dolor, G. A. (2013). Faculty awareness and readiness for outcome-based education in maritime institutions. Lyceum Maritime Journal, 5(1), 34–49.

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three ap-proaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

International Maritime Organization. (2011). STCW Convention and STCW Code: In-cluding 2010 Manila Amendments. In-ternational Maritime Organization.

International Maritime Organization. (2017). STCW Convention and STCW Code (2017 ed.). International Maritime Organiza-tion.

Macapaz, R. D. (2020). Technology-enhanced authentic assessment and its impact on competency mastery in maritime educa-tion [Doctoral dissertation, Philippine Merchant Marine Academy]. PMMA Re-pository.

Manuel, J. P. (2023). Standardization of per-formance tasks for higher-order STCW competencies: A national survey. Journal of Maritime Studies and Training, 15(3), 201–218.

Maritime Industry Authority. (2026). Regula-tory-driven competency assessment framework and the MARINA Competency Assessment System (MCAS). Maritime Industry Authority.

Mendezabal, M. J. N., & Tindowen, D. J. (2022). Compensatory averaging and incon-sistent rubric application in Philippine maritime schools: Violations of JCMMC No. 01 s. 2023. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 567–584.

Miller, G. E. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Aca-demic Medicine, 65(9 Suppl), S63–S67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045

Mori, M., et al. (2025). A systematic literature review on artificial intelligence in re-cruiting and selection: A matter of ethics. Personnel Review, 54(3), 854–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2023-0257

Navarro, R. L., Cruz, A. M., & Santos, R. (2015). Impact of calibrated OBE rubrics on English proficiency outcomes in mari-time education. Maritime Education Re-view, 12(2), 89–104.

PNTC Colleges. (2025). Assessment manual (AM-CME 22 001). PNTC Colleges.

PNTC Colleges. (2025). College of Maritime Education manual (PG-CME 25 008). PNTC Colleges.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing re-search: Generating and assessing evi-dence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Ap-proaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge Universi-ty Press.

Santos, R. M., & Reyes, L. T. (2024). Best prac-tices in 50–60% summative weighting and mandatory CO-passing: A multi-case study of top-performing MHEIs. Journal of Maritime Higher Education, 21(1), 101–125.

Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based educa-tion: Critical issues and answers. Ameri-can Association of School Administra-tors.

Sturgis, C., & Casey, K. (2018). Quality princi-ples for competency-based education. iNACOL.

Sutrisno, A., & Wijaya, A. (2023). The influence of competency-based training on the readiness of nautical cadets in the mari-time industry. Journal of Maritime Re-search and Technology, 10(2), 45–62.

Tei, Y. A. (2015). Outcome-based education and the STCW Convention: The death of competence? WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 14(2), 345–362.

Tisoy, R. I. (2025). Competencies of maritime students in professional courses: A study at a Philippine university in the context of Joint CHED-MARINA Memorandum Circular. Journal of Education, Learning, and Management. https://journals.stecab.com/jelm/article/view/1133

Tusher, H. M., Nazir, S., Ghosh, S., & Rusli, R. (2023). Seeking the best practices of as-sessment in maritime simulator training. TransNav: International Journal on Ma-rine Navigation and Safety of Sea Trans-portation, 17(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.17.01.10

Wiig, A. C., et al. (2023). Reviewing simulator-based training and assessment in mari-time education: A topic modelling ap-proach for tracing conceptual develop-ments. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 22(2), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-023-00307-4

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Patrick Mark Mesina Del Rosario. (2026). Toward Competent Graduates: A Systems – Level Review of PNTC Colleges’ Summative Assessment Framework. Advanced Social Science in Research Journal, 1(3), 751 – 766. https://doi.org/10.11594/assrj.01.03.18

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Categories

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.